Nuclear Fusion vs. Nuclear Fission

This paper entitled â€Å"Nuclear Fusion versus Atomic Fission† expects to look into atomic combination and atomic parting. It means to give the meaning of atomic combination and quickly portray atomic splitting also. It likewise plans to quickly talk about how it happens and what is required for the atomic combination and atomic parting to happen. At long last, it tries to make reference to the points of interest that atomic combination and atomic parting may acquire later. Definition Atomic combination is in fact characterized as â€Å"the event where two nuclear cores amalgamate† (Wikipedia n.p.). Such joining happens in all the stars, obviously, including the Sun (Wikipedia n.p.). On the off chance that it doesn't occur, at that point we won't experience warmth and we will perpetually be uninformed (Wikipedia n.p.). Then again, atomic splitting is actually characterized as â€Å"the strategy of separating atoms† (Wikipedia n.p.). In the event that such an activity is very hard to comprehend, attempt to envision endless balls on the floor, jumbled, in any case, seeming to shape a circle, if an individual tosses in another ball, without a doubt, the previously mentioned circle will turn out to be all the more dislocated and will take off every which way (Wikipedia n.p.). The circle is really a portrayal of the core and the ball tossed by the individual is considered as the â€Å"neutron bullet† (Wikipedia n.p.). Prerequisite for its Occurrence Moreover, for an atomic combination to occur, uncommonly high energies are viewed as important to consolidate the cores by and large (Wikipedia n.p.). This is especially required to beat the coulomb obstruction including two cores which are decidedly charged (Wikipedia n.p.). This will empower outrageous closeness that will deliver a truly ground-breaking atomic power that will associate or attach or join the cores (Wikipedia n.p.). In stars, atomic combination occurs without trouble in light of the fact that there is the presence of raised thickness and high temperature (Wikipedia n.p.). Truth be told, it has a range or around 10-15 meters (Wikipedia n.p.). Then again, for an atomic splitting to happen, we will require a neutron to trigger the previously mentioned (Wikipedia n.p.). It is significant that a ball or a neutron shot and not another sort be tossed at the circle or the nuclear core (Wikipedia n.p.). This is basically in such a case that something else, the ball would not arrive at the objective at all since the core is decidedly charged simply like the ball (Wikipedia n.p.). What will happen then is that they core and the ball will repulse one another (Wikipedia n.p.). That’s why, once more, just a neutron won't get repulsed thus it contributes to a great extent to the chance of an atomic parting to happen (Wikipedia n.p.). Favorable circumstances In addition, as far as preferences, in atomic combination, the measure of combination that can happen is really boundless (Wikipedia n.p.). Notwithstanding that, wellspring of fuel is limitless and boundless in view of the Deuterium that originates from the oceans (Wikipedia n.p.). Besides, in atomic combination, we don’t need to stress a lot over reactor mishaps that may occur in light of the way that a modest quantity of fuel is engaged with it (Wikipedia n.p.). Likewise, it produces cheap fuel (Wikipedia n.p.). It likewise creates power securely (Wikipedia n.p.). The reactor materials required, just as, the unburned fuel may perhaps be reused too (Wikipedia n.p.). One more extremely basic favorable position is the nonappearance of nursery impact (Wikipedia n.p.). To wrap things up, in atomic combination, the waste items originating from it are significantly less radioactive, hence simpler to oversee (Wikipedia n.p.). Then again, in atomic splitting, the measure of parting that may happen is constrained (Wikipedia n.p.). Notwithstanding that, in atomic parting, the waste items are significantly more radioactive, therefore progressively hard to deal with (Wikipedia n.p.). References Wikipedia. Atomic Fusion. 21 April 2007. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 22 April 2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion        Â

Fault Creep of Active Faults - Overview

Deficiency Creep of Active Faults - Overview Deficiency creep is the name for the moderate, consistent slippage that can happen on some dynamic issues without there being a seismic tremor. At the point when individuals find out about it, they regularly wonder if shortcoming creep can defuse future seismic tremors, or make them littler. The appropriate response is most likely not, and this article clarifies why. Terms of Creep In geography, creep is utilized to portray any development that includes a consistent, progressive change fit as a fiddle. Soil creep is the name for the gentlest type of landsliding. Disfigurement creep happens inside mineral grains as rocks become twisted and collapsed. Issue creep, additionally called aseismic creep, occurs at the Earths surface on a little part of shortcomings. Crawling conduct occurs on a wide range of flaws, however its generally clear and most effortless to envision protesting slip deficiencies, which are vertical breaks whose contrary sides move sideways as for one another. Probably, it occurs on the huge subduction-related flaws that offer ascent to the biggest seismic tremors, yet we cannot gauge those submerged developments all around ok yet to tell. The development of creep, estimated in millimeters every year, is moderate and consistent and at last emerges from plate tectonics. Structural developments apply a power (weight) on the rocks, which react with an adjustment fit as a fiddle (strain). Strain and Force on Faults Flaw creep emerges from the distinctions in strain conduct at various profundities on an issue. Down profound, the stones on a shortcoming are so hot and delicate that the deficiency faces essentially stretch past one another like taffy. That is, the stones experience malleable strain, which continually diminishes the majority of the structural pressure. Over the flexible zone, rocks change from malleable to fragile. In the weak zone, stress develops as the stones distort flexibly, similarly as though they were mammoth squares of elastic. While this is going on, the sides of the shortcoming are bolted together. Tremors happen when weak rocks discharge that flexible strain and snap back to their casual, unstrained state. (On the off chance that you comprehend seismic tremors as versatile strain discharge in weak rocks, you have the psyche of a geophysicist.) The following fixing in this image is the second power that holds the deficiency bolted: pressure created by the heaviness of the stones. The more prominent this lithostatic pressure, the more strain that the shortcoming can aggregate. Creep in a Nutshell Presently we can understand deficiency creep: it occurs close to the surface where lithostatic pressure is low enough that the flaw isn't bolted. Contingent upon the harmony among bolted and opened zones, the speed of creep can shift. Cautious investigations of issue creep, at that point, can give us traces of where bolted zones lie beneath. From that, we may pick up pieces of information about how structural strain is developing along a flaw, and possibly win some knowledge into what sort of tremors might be coming. Estimating creep is a mind boggling workmanship since it happens close to the surface. The many strike-slip flaws of California incorporate a few that are crawling. These incorporate the Hayward deficiency in the east side of San Francisco Bay, the Calaveras issue just toward the south, the crawling portion of the San Andreas flaw in focal California, and part of the Garlock shortcoming in southern California. (Be that as it may, crawling shortcomings are commonly uncommon.) Measurements are made by rehashed studies along lines of perpetual imprints, which might be as basic as a column of nails in a road asphalt or as intricate as creepmeters emplaced in burrows. At most areas, creep floods at whatever point dampness from storms enters into the dirt in California that implies the winter blustery season. Creep's Effect on Earthquakes On the Hayward shortcoming, creep rates are no more prominent than a couple of millimeters for each year. Indeed, even the most extreme is only a small amount of the all out structural development, and the shallow zones that creep could never gather a lot of strain vitality in any case. Crawling zones there are overwhelmingly exceeded by the size of the bolted zone. By and large, happens a couple of years after the fact since creep diminishes a touch of strain, nobody could tell. The crawling section of the San Andreas issue is surprising. No huge quakes have ever been recorded on it. Its a piece of the flaw, around 150 kilometers in length, that creeps at around 28 millimeters for every year and seems to have just little bolted zones assuming any. For what reason is a logical riddle. Specialists are taking a gander at different elements that might be greasing up the shortcoming here. One factor might be the nearness of copious earth or serpentinite rock along the deficiency zone. Another factor might be underground water caught in residue pores. Also, just to make things somewhat more unpredictable, it might be that creep is a transitory thing, restricted so as to the early piece of the seismic tremor cycle. Despite the fact that analysts have since a long time ago idea that the crawling segment may prevent huge cracks from spreading across it, ongoing investigations have thrown that into question. The SAFOD boring task prevailing with regards to examining the stone right on the San Andreas issue in its crawling segment, at a profundity of very nearly 3 kilometers. At the point when the centers were first revealed, the nearness of serpentinite was self-evident. In any case, in the lab, high-pressure trial of the center material demonstrated that it was exceptionally powerless in light of the nearness of a dirt mineral called saponite. Saponite structures where serpentinite meets and responds with common sedimentary rocks. Mud is extremely successful at catching pore water. Along these lines, as regularly occurs in Earth science, everybody is by all accounts right.

Personal Project Portfolio- How To Improve My English Writing

Personal Project Portfolio- How To Improve My English Writing Personal Project Portfolio- How To Improve My English Writing Skill.How Did I Solve The Problem â€" Essay Example > Executive SummaryThis is a Personal Project Portfolio which is designed to help me work towards improving my English writing skills for they are a prerequisite in Advance Bilingual Enhancement with a Major of Translation and Interpreting, a course that I am undertaking. Having had difficulties and weaknesses that go by bilingual, improving productive and receptive skills is of great importance for they coexist and so they can never be separated. Having substantial difficulties in understanding the rhetorical organization, appropriate language use and specific lexicon which need to be used in the written communication, I saw a need of finding strategies to help me improve my writing skills. In this article, I therefore explore and implement ways and actions that are crucial in reinforcing my writing skills in terms of grammatical and syntactical forms as a way for improving my skills as well as increase my level of writing skills. This plan has been a success for I have registered substantial improvements in the sameAfter analyzing and having an encounter with several English words, I came up with bilingual glossaries where by the definitions of the new words are documented as well as any example to go with them for future reference for it has words definition and their translation. After designing the action plan, implementing the same was of great concern. Implementation solely relied on the on my commitment irrespective of how my schedule was on daily basis. I had to reschedule myself to attend to the demand of the plan which I did and substantially had an improvement in writing skills. Vast exposure to English vocabularies, revising or re-reading these vocabularies greatly assisted me to achieve great improvement. Any other requirement of such an exercise is highly appreciated for through it, my profession will be moved to the next levelEnglish ExperienceImproving my English has been my desire for a long time as I continue with my studies in Advance Bil ingual Enhancement with a Major of Translation and Interpreting. This has compelled me to taking a bold step towards that direction. This being the case, coming up with my Personal Project Portfolio for my course gave me a clear play ground to work towards my desire. First, I acknowledged that, I must do something to ‘Improve my English’. By acknowledging this, there is one this that was very clear to me. That there are some issues that were lacking in my English that needed to be improved and that is the reason why I did not say that I am working towards enhancing my English. In many occasions, I have had more difficulties when it comes to my speaking and writing that it is to the listening and reading skills. I understand that all this skills are of great importance and since there is a room for improvement, my option is to work hard towards polishing my English skills whether productive of receptive skills. This is attributed to the fact that, both skills co-exist. For exam ple, I am sure it is impossible to write without reading and it equally hard to hold a meaning of a conversation without listening.

High Artistic Merit Films Exude Special Effects That Take...

High artistic merit films exude special effects that take Hollywood by storm. The American Film Institute lists Forrest Gump as one of the greatest American films of all time. Released in 1994 by Paramount Pictures, Forrest Gump tells the story of a Southern, mentally challenged man named Forrest Gump who experiences many tribulations in his life, such as having a low IQ of 75 and wearing braces on his leg as a child. Throughout the plot of the film, Forrest adheres to a signature phrase coined by his mother, â€Å"Life was like a box of chocolates. You never know what you’re gonna get.† His willingness allows him to participate in some of the most iconic American events in the 1960s and 1970s. Throughout the film, Forrest serves in the Vietnam War, masters table tennis, met erstwhile presidents, opens a shrimp business, and even journeys across the country. Above everything else, the character played by Tom Hanks wants to marry his childhood sweetheart, Jenny Curran, w ho he always cared about. With a budget of $55 million, the lighthearted comedy-drama’s use of special effects paid off as the Academy Award-winning film remains one of the most iconic American films in history. Director Robert Zemeckis exploits special effects such as zoomed-in shots, computer-generated imagery, and blue screens to enhance the theme of a defined destiny as one deals with chance elements in life. By zooming in on a white feather arbitrarily floating in the air that ultimately lands on Forrest’s

Hitler s First World War I Essay - 1211 Words

Hitler got his first feel for war in World War 1. He was a runner during the war and was wounded during it. During 1919, there was a meeting for the German Workers’ Party (DAP) in Munich that Hitler went to observe. Hitler had many ties with the Thule Society, which was organized around racial philosophy and a belief in military action. The Thule Society were also strong supporters of Hitler’s idea of a national socialist movement. Later in 1919, Hitler was asked to join the DAP as well as become a part of the executive committee for the party. Joining the party gave him a greater opportunity to express his political views and gave him a view of leadership. In February 1920, the DAP party held its first big meeting in the Hofbrauhaus. At this meeting, Hitler introduced the twenty-five point program which described the movement of opposition against capitalism, Jews, and Democracy and was the party’s main platform. According to Hitler, this meeting was a huge turn ing point for the movement. The name of the party was later changed to the Nationalist Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP), which was also known as Nazi for short. In April 1920, Hitler quit the army and focused completely on politics, in doing so the Nazi movement had begun. In 1921, a crisis in the party gave Hitler a push for more control of the party. In July 1921, Hitler resigned from the party and the only way he would rejoin was under certain conditions. One being the election of a new executiveShow MoreRelatedHitler s Impact On The World War II1636 Words   |  7 Pagessquare, saluting and chanting Hitler s name. World War II has begun and many Germans hope for improvements in the economy. Their leader is Adolf Hitler. Adolf Hitler, dictator of Germany in World War II, was a powerful speaker who caused over 5 million deaths in concentration camps. Though Hitler s impact can be felt in modern times, the roots of his atrocious behavior began at childhood—mor e specifically—high school. Years before Adolf Hitler was born, Hitler s great grandfather, Johann GeorgRead MoreAdolf Hitler And The Nazi Regime1552 Words   |  7 Pages I have read a lot of interesting books, but I’ve never been quite fond of history books. However for my American History class I read: People Who Made History; Adolf Hitler, and I have to say this book was rather interesting. This book gave a lot of background and history to Adolf’s childhood, along with his military strategies, as well as his rise and fall as leader of the Nazi regime. This book was incredibly descriptive, and passionately written, even though it was a fact based book one reallyRead MoreThe Terror Of World War II Essay1492 Words   |  6 PagesThe Terror of WWII I. Adolf Hitler is no doubt the most infamous person that ever existed on this planet. He had an impact on the whole world during WWII. Hitler was the leader of the Nazi party during the second World War. Adolf Hitler had hated the Jews and had imprisoned them in what is known as concentration camps and had killed over 17 million people during WWII. II. Early Life a. Born April 20, 1889 in Braunau am Inn, Austria. b. His grandfather was in fact Jewish. c. He had grown up in aRead MoreWorld War 2910 Words   |  4 Pages2/15/12 DBQ: World War II The Road to War During the early 1920 s many people thought that peace had finally been reached. However, in the late 1920 s and throughout the 1930 s, they realized that they were wrong. Dictators came into power in countries that were displeased with the results of World War I. Germany, Italy and Japan wanted power, so they took aggressive action that not even The League of Nations could stop. British Prime Minister Chamberlain thought that the best wayRead MoreAdolf Hitler As A Post Christ1349 Words   |  6 Pages People sometimes refer to Adolf Hitler as a post-Christ Nero because of Hitler s ruthless attitudes and actions towards innocent citizens, similar to Nero when he persecuted Christians during his rule about two thousand years prior(Kershaw). Hitler dealt with a depressing childhood, which included the deaths of his parents and the inability to pursue his dreams as an artist(Knapp). Thereafter, Hitler became interested in politics, as he eventually joined the Small German W orkers party(Nazis)Read MoreThe Terror Of Wwii : Adolf Hitler1456 Words   |  6 PagesThe Terror of WWII: Adolf Hitler’s Rise to Power Adolf Hitler is no doubt the most infamous person that ever existed on this planet. He had an impact on the whole world during WWII and had changed every person’s view of war in the 1930s and 1940s. Hitler was the leader (or Fuhrer) of Germany and the head of the Nazi party during the Second World War (www.biography.com). Adolf had hated everyone that did not have the same â€Å"perfect† quality that the â€Å"Aryan race† had, which is basicallyRead MoreOrigins of the Second World War in Europe1637 Words   |  7 PagesTo uncover the origins of the Second World War is a difficult task and to summarize it, even more so, but this is exactly what historian P.M.H. Bell does in his astounding book The Origins of the Second World War in Europe. Although Bell does a great job of providing accounts on both sides of the debate on the origins of the Second World War, he does have his own mindset about it. In his eyes, Bell sees the Second World War as being a thirty year war, driven by the ideology and economics of GermanyRead MoreEven Though Hitler Was Incontrol Of Killing Of Men And1561 Words   |  7 PagesEven though Hitler was incontrol of killing of men and women. His leadership helped Germany s economy. Adolf Hitler, the soldier who was once a decorated war veteran World War I, the leader who was once worshipped by millions of Germans, he was responsible for the massacre million Jews, is now the most hated dictator of the 20th Century. Everyone should know what Hitler has done to Jewish people of taht time. Hitler gained power because of society s discontent of the government and the societyRead MoreA Totalitarian State Of The Soviet Union1552 Words   |  7 PagesAll of the leaders have something in common, they all wanted power. They all realized that with power comes great responsibility, they gave themselves too much responsibility. Joseph Stalin, the dictator of the Soviet Union created fascism. Adolf Hitler, the leader of Germany created the Nazi Party. Benito Mussolini, the leader of the Italy was a part of the communist party. Francisco Franco, the leader of Spain overthrew the democratic republic in 1939 and Spain became a totalitarian state. TotalitarianismRead MoreChristopher Columbus s Influence On The Colonization Of The Americas1330 Words   |  6 PagesChristopher Columbus did not set out on his voyage, intending to discover a new continent and change the course of the world so dramatically; and if he had not played his role in the colonization of the Americas, someone else would have. Likewise, the cascade of events that led to World War I could be blamed on Archduke Ferdinand, his assassin, or even his driver, but the Great War would have erupted even if the assassination had never taken place at all. Sometimes, though, the power and personality

Premium Development Case Free Essays

New England Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) is a regional not for profit managed care company that has its headquarters in Boston, MA, with over 500,000 enrollees within 25 different plans including Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. A consortium of employers has shown interest in bidding on a managed care contract to be offered to the consortium’s 75,000 employees whom are locate in and around Nashua, New Hampshire. The consortium of employers includes companies such as IBM, Ford, and Prudential Insurance. We will write a custom essay sample on Premium Development Case or any similar topic only for you Order Now The approach that New England has to the premium development is that the premiums received from the employers must cover the cost of the providing required healthcare services, also known as medical costs, and the costs of administering the plan and of establishing reserves, also known as other costs. Reserves are necessary to ensure that funds are available to pay providers when medical costs exceed the amount collected in premium payments (3901-3-13 Health Insurance Reserves, 2010). Due to New England HMO being a not for profit corporation, there is not explicitly include any type of profit element within the premium. A requirement to the reserve is set sufficiently high in order to ensure there are enough investments available to fund product growth and expansion. Therefore, part of the reserve requirements does constitute a profit. (Premium Development Case Study, 2007) A base per member per month (PMPM) is used in setting premiums by estimating the PMPM for each aspect of the plan’s coverage benefits. Setting the premiums also utilizes historical utilization as well as cost data. The co-payments are used a source of revenue to decrease medical cost and lessen the premiums. New England HMO adds fifteen percent to the total medical PMPM to cover any administrative costs that may incur and an additional five percent added for the reserve. The Individual Rate Factor is set at 1. 216 and the Family Rate Factor is set at 3. 356. The application of the given information allows the calculations to develop based on the levels of three co-payments, low, moderate, and high. The historical utilization and historical data for facility services is the same, regardless of the level of patient’s level of co-payment. The average fees are as follows: Inpatient Acute Care Services – Average daily free-for-service charge$1,200. 00 Surgical Procedures per case$1,300. 00 Skilled Nursing$430. 00 Mental Care – Average Daily Cost $540. 00 Emergency Room Care per visit$190. 00 The following services were calculated by dividing the cases, days, and/or the visits per year by 1,000. ServiceCalculationResult Inpatient Acute Care400/1,0000. 4 Skilled Nursing Facility Care25. 2/1,0000. 0252 Inpatient Mental Care64. 4/1,0000. 0644 Hospital Based-Surgery41. 7/1,0000. 0417 Emergency Room Care132/1,0000. 132 Next, in order to attempt to find the base PMPM cost, the utilization data is multiplied historical cost. Once this is completed, the product is then divided by twelve. For instance, the inpatient acute care cost is calculation by multiplying $1,200. 00 by 0. 4, then dividing by twelve. The cost would equal $40. This process will be used to calculate the remaining inpatient services. Using the information provided by the consortium, substance abuse as a base PMPM cost of $0. 41, while the base PMPM for outpatient services is $3. 43. The facility services total cost is $54. 25. Upon calculating the base PMPM costs, the patient co-payment adjustment factors must be determined. The high patient co-payment for acute services in Table 2 shows that the co-pay cost adjustment factor is 0. 9642 and 0. 9200 for the co-pay utilization adjustment factor (additional inpatient services information is located within the Premium Development Case Study). Once all factors have been defined, the adjusted PMPM cost can be calculated by multiplying the cost by the historical data and the historical utilization by utilization, then multiplying the two products and dividing by twelve. For example, for Inpatient Acute Care adjusted PMPM calculation is as follows: (1,200*1) * (0. 4*1)/12, which 40. The remaining inpatient services are calculated in the same manner, however the substance abuse adjusted PMPM cost and outpatient procedures adjusted PMPM cost is its base PMPM cost. In the end, once all adjusted PMPM costs have been calculated, the total is equal to $44. 74. Much of the information for the physician services is provided within the case study. In order to calculated the adjusted PMPM cost, the calculation is as follows: (3,400*utilization) * (175,000*cost)/1,000)/12 For example, (3,400*1. 8900/4000) * (175,000*1. 6834)/1,000)/12 = 39. 44. The adjusted PMPM for physician services equals to $27. 24. The inflation rate is five percent; this plays a significant role within the analysis as like any other business, costs rise over time. In order to calculate the inflation adjusted PMPM cost for inpatient services, the adjusted PMPM cost is multiplied by the sum of 1 and the inflation rate of five percent, or 0. 05. ; this equal to $50. 79. The same calculations are done in order to solve the adjusted PMPM costs for the physician services. The total of this is $114. 9. The total medical PMPM amount is the sum of the physician services inflation adjusted PMPM cost ($114. 39) and then inpatient services adjusted PMPM costs ($50. 79), which equals to $165. 18. All other expenses are calculated by multiplying the total medical PMPM amount by the administrative expense percent. Therefore, $165. 18 * 0. 15 equals $24. 78. In order to calculate the reserve, t he total medical PMPM amount is then multiplied by the reserve percentage. Therefore, $165. 18 * 0. 05 equals $8. 26. These amounts combined will equal the total other expenses, which calculated to equal ($8. 6 + $24. 78) $33. 04. The inflation adjusted PMPM is calculated in the same manner as other services. This amount will equal $34. 69. The total PMPM amount is equal to $199. 86. In order to calculate the final figure, the monthly premium rates, the total PMPM amount is multiplied by the premium factor rate, which is 1. 216 for single and 3. 356 for family. The single monthly premium rates will equal $199. 86 * 1. 216, which equals $243. 03. The family monthly premium rates will equal $199. 86 * 3. 356, which equals $670. 73. How to cite Premium Development Case, Essay examples

Free Hamlets Hamlets Immaturity and Rude Essay Example For Students

Free Hamlets: Hamlets Immaturity and Rude Essay ness Hamlet essaysHamlets Immaturity and Rudeness Hamlet identifies with an adolescent of the 1990s more than he does with the youth of his own time. Hamlet is immature, sarcastic, and takes action during the heat of passion which is very much like the behavior of the youth in the 1990s. Love, control over action, and the ability to overcome depression are just a few ways to prove maturity. It is obvious Hamlet loves Ophelia in his own way . . . the celestial and my souls idol, the most beautified Ophelia . . . (Hamlet. II, ii, 109- 110), but his way is not mature enough to include trust toward his lover. The trust that Hamlet should have given her was the key of his madness. This madness that Hamlet cannot trust his love with is the same madness that he loses total control over because of his immaturity; it then causes him to do things, such as kill Polonius, that a person that was mature could stop. The madness that Hamlet assumes is understandable but he can never get over the actual death of his father by still wearing black a year later, and the hasty marriage of his mother to Claudius. Compared to Horatio who is calm and cool throughout the play, and Fortinbras who collected an army to fight for his uncles land and honor, Hamlets maturity level for his time is low, especially for being a prince. Today Hamlets age group is more immature than during his own time so he relates to the youth of the 1990s better than he does with the adolescents of his own time. Sarcasm, and blunt rudeness is often used by Hamlet in order to offend people that, during his time, he should not have offended. Hamlet often used the hasty marriage of his mother to offend Claudius. The first time that Hamlet offends Claudius in the company of another person is when Claudius is supposed to be helping cheer Hamlet up. A little more than kin, and less than kind. (Hamlet. I, ii, 65) is just as rude during Hamlets time as almost anything that a person could say today, it just takes a little thinking for the people of today to get what Hamlet means. The second person that Hamlet is openly rude to is Polonius. Hamlet, in front of Claudius and Gertrude, insults Polonius by calling him . . . a fishmonger. (Hamlet. II, ii, 174) This is not the only way that Hamlet offended Polonius. Hamlet offended Polonius by insulting his daughter. Hamlet is crude in his own day by asking Ophelia Lady, shall I lie in your lap? (Hamlet. III, ii, 115) What is strange about Hamlets ability to use his mouth is that the youth of today is able to use the same kinds of sarcasm and rudeness effectively, just as Hamlet does, but with Hamlets political position he should not have offended the people such as his stepfather. Being radical and acting on impulse is something that Hamlet had to use in order to get his work finished. Hamlet, having a hard time getting revenge, applied his anger from the judgment of his mother to kill who he thought was Claudius. Hamlet also needed to be on his own deathbed in order to finally get angry enough to kill Claudius. The way that Hamlet uses his anger to take action is very much like the youth today in the fact that if someone has a problem with log cutting, for example, they hold protests and take action against that problem. The second way that Hamlet is extreme is when he goes with the ghost that looks like his father even though his friends warn him that the ghost may be evil and . . . .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 , .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 .postImageUrl , .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 , .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91:hover , .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91:visited , .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91:active { border:0!important; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91:active , .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91 .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u20c66afe723fb2daa770c07ddbd55f91:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: What's 3D animation? Introduction of the 3D animat Essaytempt you toward the flood . . . Or to the dreadful summit of the cliff . . . (Hamlet. I, iv, 69-70). If the prince was thinking right he would not have gone with the ghost that resembled the old . . . King, father, royal Dane . . . (Hamlet. I, iv, 45) Hamlets radical actions do not just prove that he is immature but also proves that he needs action from outside sources in order to get a reaction from himself. This is just like the youth of the 1990s in the respect that if something is wrong, such as the cutting of an old growth forest, then they usually act against it in dramatic ways. An immature, mouthy, extremist is what adolescents of the 1990s are compared to the youth of Hamlets time. The inability to love maturely, rudeness towards authority, and reacting to anger is what the youth of the 1990s and Hamlet have in common. Hamlet would have a much easier time living during these times than his own. Hamlets immaturity, rudeness, and radical behavior is just like todays youth and that is the insight that Hamlet has towards the youth of the 1990s.

john warr Essay Example

john warr Essay Civil War Art is a big part of history today.People today us it to remember the war.How did people survive, where did people live, why did we fight are all questions and wonders of people today.Artist these days and back than drew about those questions.It gave people a mental picture on how our world was back than.Also what the Civil War was about.Today there are many artists that paint pictures about the Civil War. Civil War Art is very valuable.It brings back the life of the Civil War.Artist chose the sight or the position of what they are painting.It really affects the final painting.They choose to paint the scars of a direct shell hit.Paintings also of bulges in coats were shown from having a rock lying for so long in their patch pocket.Artist paint mainly only three-quarter of the killed soldiers, paintings show swollen and blotted bodies that have been laying out in the heat for quite a few days. John Warr was one of the many artists today that draw paintings of the Civil War.W arr lives in Northern Alabama.Began Painting in 1980.His interest in the Civil War photos and reenactments.He decided to do a confederate scene.Many of John Warrs paintings have quite a bit of wildlife in them.Which is another of his interest to paint along w/ Civil War Art. Amy Lindenberger another artist that draws scenes of the Civil War.Amy lives in Ohio where she has been painting quite a few of her Civil War paintings.Amy was always interested in Civil War.With her two daughters she became involved with Civil War reenacting.She noticed by reenacting that there is more to the lives of Americans who lived at the time of the War than just what occurred on the battlefield.The war had a big impact on the common soldiers and to the families.She now has a series, which focuses more directly on the wars impact on the common soldier and the families. Dale Gallon was very interested in Civil War Art

Discuss the Way Women Are Presented in Film Noir and How Neo-Noir Women Challenge the Original Femme Fatale Essay Example

Discuss the Way Women Are Presented in Film Noir and How Neo Discuss the Way Women Are Presented in Film Noir and How Neo-Noir Women Challenge the Original Femme Fatale Essay Discuss the Way Women Are Presented in Film Noir and How Neo-Noir Women Challenge the Original Femme Fatale Essay When looking at more modern takes of film noir, the women certainly challenge the ideologies of what a typical femme fatale would represent because of what drives them. Assessing proto-noir based films; the women were stereotyped and were believed to challenge the pressures that regular women endure on a daily basis. Typically of an American proto-noir the films had hidden agendas and aimed to teach political lessons to those that took interest. A lot of the time in the films, it was projected that sexuality lead to crime and those that involved themselves in deviant acts would be punished, which most of the time the men would end up in jail and the femme fatale character would be killed. However, in a sad twist, the good guys would die and the criminals would win. In film noir the characters are often very clear cut and in the plot there are often psychological twists, like that of in the neo-noir film The Last Seduction. The audience are dumb-founded when they are introduced to Wendy Kroy. She is very precise in her actions and it is very easy to see her story slowly unfold. Particularly when we see a lot of binary opposites come to light. For example, within the character of Wendy Kroy, there is no such thing as a gendered self. The signs here are that she dresses in a minimal and masculine manner, the way she smokes and in particular the way that after intercourse she always puts on a mens shirt. She is always in a constant state of drag and as the viewer; we see how she constructs herself. In Proto-noir there is a hegemonic assumption of what a woman should be. Writers particularly modelled the characters on a stereotypical 1940s-50s house wife. Mildred Pierce, a famous proto-noir character was a devoted wife and mother, before her husband left her. She was a home-maker and in the scenes before she where she has lack of control over herself and actions, the audience see she is cooking and doting on her two daughters. Conversely, the character of Wendy Kroy mocks this typical ideology and hegemony by baking some cookies, which she has seemingly poisoned. As she offers them to a gentleman, she places nails under the tyres of his car. These sorts of tricks defy those of a typical femme fatale. Feminist Simone de Beauvoir once said that There are no real women because the idea of a woman is repeated so many times in so many forms of literature that the true woman is non existent. One opposition that would never usually be seen in proto-noir were same sex relationships. However a neo-noir film called Bound, challenges gender alignment and the capability of women. The film is driven by sexual fantasy or desire which is reflected in the relationship of Corky and Violet. Gender is inversed by both members of this relationship and this is what is known as homoeroticism. There is an erotic exchange between the two characters as they engage in arousing one another in quite graphic scenes which unlike in proto-noir, sexual behaviour was insinuated not performed. In proto-noir, sex is substituted with violence. Violet is no shrinking violet. Her hyper- femininity is pushed to the maximum with the way she speaks in her overly high pitched voiced right down to the way she dresses. All of her clothing over-emphasizes her femininity, almost to the point where it becomes apparent to the audience that she is desperately trying and portraying an image of a butch femme. Her dresses are short and her heels are very high. She almost has the look of a 50s pin-up. On the other hand Corky is very masculine in her clothing and surroundings which are quite bachelor styled. However in a certain scene where Corky is carrying out some plumbing work, the wall behind her juxtapositions her masculinity because it is a floral print, which puts a huge emphasis on her mannish appearance. When Corky first meets violet, she is offered a drink and asks for a beer, Violet drinks Gin and Tonic. However when the two get alone together, Violet switches her drink to a more masculine scotch. This shows the audience that the two women are now on the same level. There is also a bit of role reversal, Cesar Violets husband comes across as being quite effeminate with the way he acts. Although he is part of the gangster culture, he and his associates show signs of typical feminine behaviour, for example when they look at themselves in the mirror, or take pride in their appearance as they dress smartly. Cesar is a parody of masculinity, for instance in the scene where he comes home with the money covered in blood. Instead of quickly washing and drying it, he launders it with precision to the extent that he starches it. Violet just stands and watches which shows the role reversal as he obviously believes that the woman is not capable of doing the job just as well as him. He is standing ironing in his underwear which is poignant to the fact that the viewer can see his vulnerability. I would compare Wendy Kroy to Corky as being quite similar in that they both give off such a masculine image but both have undertones of femininity. Both are quite slim with petite facial features. They both have wants and sexual desires, and orgasmic femme is a staple of neo-noir. Perhaps economic power is a major influence on the women, and although Corky seemed to be struggling in the beginning, she and Violet seem to get their hands on Cesars cash. Wendy on the other hand has succeeded in pushing all the men out of her life just to get a hold of some money. Violet, like Wendy has an inadequate husband but unlike in Mildred Pierces case, the women flee the marriage which indicates the independence a woman has gained with the help of the feminist movement. Over the years the force and persistence of women became the destroyers of male domination which can be traced back to the war time reassignment of roles both at home and at work, women substituted the role of men which challenged the patriarchal and hegemonic values of society. The changes can clearly be seen in noir films and in the rise of femme-fetale characters over the years.

Contract Law Problems Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Contract Law Problems - Essay Example ..any laws or regulations directed toward enforcing certain promises. In Australia contract law is primarily regulated by the 'common law', but increasingly statutes are supplementing the common law of contract - particularly in relation to consumer protection. â€Å" (Clarke, 2011). This law was formerly known in legal circles as the Trade Practices Act of 1974 but was officially renamed The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 on January 1, 2011 due to certain amendments that were made that â€Å"included a repeal of Part IVA (unconscionable conduct), Part V (Consumer Protection, including s 52), Part VA (Manufacturer's Liability) and Part VC (offences). The substance of the provisions that were contained in those parts is now contained in Schedule 2 of the Act which will be known as the 'Australian Consumer Law' and which, by virtue of enabling state and territory legislation, contains Australia's first nationally consistent consumer law. â€Å" (Clarke, 2011). One must keep in mi nd that a written contract is legally binding at the time of signing and cannot be altered nor revoked due to certain conditions that became present after the contract has been signed. By signing a contract, it becomes a legally binding promise on the side of both contracting parties to complete an agreed upon obligation. Australian law requires that a certain set of circumstances must be present at the time of the agreement for the written document to become a valid contract. These factors include â€Å" a compromising offer and acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal relations, compliance with any legal formalities and that the parties have the legal capacity to contract. â€Å" (Clarke 2010). The contract that Watertankz entered into with Harry specifically detailed what he had to do as a client in order to make the document that contained their price quote into a legally binding contract. To be specific, their letter of communication clearly indicated that all Har ry had to do was â€Å"please sign the enclosed terms and conditions of sale document and mail it back to us together with a 10% deposit. The quote is valid until June 30 â€Å". I would then ask Harry to take note of the validity date of the quote that was sent to him, June 30. Under the agreement that was proposed and approved by the company signatories, his rights as their client and their obligation to fulfil the agreement is clearly spelled out. As long as Harry signs the document and gets the document and the check deposit in the mail before June 30, the contract is now legally binding. As such, there are now legal sanctions in place should either party decide to renege on their deal prior to the deadline (Government of South Australia, Contract Law, 2009). Just like any other company in the public service, the price of Watertankz supplies and other pertinent materials may see an increase in cost at any given moment. Which is exactly what happened in the case of Harry. The c ost of materials for Watertankz rose sharply on the first day of June, which would definitely cut into their profit margin or post a loss for their company earnings. So, it us understandable that they adjust their prices accordingly. However, the law of contracts clearly indicates that they cannot reject and formal contract bids that they closed within a specific time frame, regardless of the increase in costs for their own company. The law in effect, protects the

Construction contracts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Construction contracts - Essay Example s such, has requested to identify the strategies using which the pace of construction may be accelerated and has additionally asked to identify and describe all the potential pitfalls involved. The analysis of the current parameters associated with the project has outlined a number of parameters that are considered crucial if nay kind of progress is to be made with regards to completing the project within the specified schedule. In fact, a number of factors such as the quality, cost and safety standards will play a interdependent role in determining if the project can be completed within the schedule. A preliminary analysis of the project timeline has suggested that the design of the project took a longer time than was originally planned and this was attributed to the delay in fine tuning the design to all legal standards as also the latency induced in obtaining permissions from the requisite governmental agencies. Since the design phase was complete thereupon, the time lost due to the design phase cannot be recovered. Therefore, the need of the hour is to concentrate on accelerating the speed with which the construction phase has been progressing until now. The early analysis has also highlighted the fact that until now, the customer has been dealing directly with all the contractors and this has hampered the progress of the project. The reasons for this is simply due to the reason that there is a gap of communication between the client and the contractors in discussing the finer details of the project from time to time. As such, the client is preliminarily advised to appoint an intermediary who will be responsible for handling all the customer requirements with the client. This will also enable smoother communication as such an intermediary is supposed to function as a suitable interface between the two parties. The second major deficiency that was uncovered as part of the preliminary investigation was the simple fact that the client had not committed to a

Managing change at the organization Royal Mail

Managing change at the organization Royal Mail Managing change in organization is a very difficult task but it is one of the required processes to be done in critical situations (demand). I have taken the organization Royal mail as a part of explaining how the royal mail group managed the change in the organisation. A new culture has been involved may be called as the management style change system in Royal mail. The further reports which I am going to point out will tell the facts how the change in management is managed by the Royal mail group of organization. In order to develop the manager styles a development plan has been implemented and evaluated to find out the reports of the new change plan and see how it works. This is done in accordance with a need that manager should have a stable style of management ethics and work activities to be carried out while in the job and it is the duty of the management team to monitor in regular intervals of time to time A small introduction about Royal Mail Group: When it comes to post or parcel in the U. K nobody never forget the Royal mail. The royal mail is a parent company of the post office ltd United Kingdom. Royal mail is one of the important businesses in the U.K (postal business and parcel service all over the world). The royal mail takes a pride by producing a fact that they deliver millions of letters to appropriate address in the UK everyday thereby stabilizing the brand of Royal mail group. They employ around 200,000 people for their postal services. Task 1 The back ground to change is mainly because of the advancement of technologies, new methods implemented all over the organisations thereby demanding the present organisation to make a change. This will support the organisation to a greater extent. The motivation to change is done by looking at the current economy, the current organisational change, certain needs of the organisation and many more. Taking the organisation royal mail group, I would like to explain in detail why the organisation needed a change? The letter and packages business has been divided into several sections like Difficult regulations and policies Process dominated organisation Lagging of technology Difficult regulations and policies: The different regulations and policies of the royal mail group increase the customer choice and competition. Followed by this, it is very difficult for royal mail to accept the proposals made by the post office. This will affect their ability to do service to the customers at a single price. The variations are going to affect them to greater extent. This will increase the weakness of the company. As a post office group, lot of external pressures from government will also add up. Hence there was a question on how royal group will achieve stable profitability. This made a need in change of the organisation. Process dominated organisation: The process is totally dominated by the organisation thereby demanding the buercratic style of passive employees. This will cause major operation in-efficiencies and hence the motivation of work force will go down. The work force will then form a union and will lead a strike. This type of actions will de-value the name of the royal mail group. Hence we need the change in management here to be taken place in this organisation. Lagging of technology: In todays world, technology has increased to a greater extent. More advancement has created the organisations to change their way and style of process. Task 1 Evaluate the Strength and weakness of bureaucratic organisation These types of organisation are well -structured, have a clear process authority and control. They are well suited for stable environments. The technologies can be used in a routine way in this type of organisations. The process they use, the technologies they adopt are quite difficult thereby the job in these types of organisation is quite rigid. The organisational structure is designed in such a way that only the job which has to be done will be processed and done. Strengths: The rules and behaviour are combined and strict The unity in operation is implemented in the organisation even with change in personal circumstances. The orientation structure is impersonal Functional specialisation is the main source for labours functional division Allocation of task is very stable in this type of organisation Based upon the technical knowledge of the employee, the promotion is initiated or given The job recruitment s is done on merit basis Proper membership is a way to a proper career in this type of organisations The authority of any process is legally defined The qualifications for any process is tested properly before being implemented The allocation of limited discretion officers and also the organisation has legally based tenure Weakness: The weakness of the organisation is also defined here to understand the changes to be done in bureaucratic organisations. The organisation have a rule that the authority is not on the person it is dependent on the position. Lagging of empathy due to its strict rules and regulations Lagging of rationality Decision making being more inflexible Limits defined in decision making Due to high rules are regulations, the decision making is done slow In this organisation there is no priority or any urgency Thus these are the evaluation of strength and weakness of bureaucratic organisations. Task 1 Alternative forms of organisational development Organisational development is said to be a planned intervention. There are many interventions developed to solve different problems. The plans and actions are designed for the change in the organisation. The organisation will implement different interventions in order to achieve the success. The main goal of the organisational structure is to achieve the goal with the change. There are different types of interventions. Many interventions are combined to produce different action plans. The whole actions include organisational training, analysis, conflict management, team management and organisational re-structuring. Types of interventions: Human resources the e.g. includes team building, consultation and recruitment process Technically more structural also can be defined as techno structural e.g. The management called total quality management, the re structure process and the design of work /process Management human resource e.g. 1. Diversity in management 2. Performance management 3. Appraisal of employees and many more Strategy process E.g. culture change involvement, transformation of organisation, self designing and management in strategy The training sensitivity: The main purpose of this training is to understand the behaviours aspect of themselves and to understand the others perception. Improvement can be done by getting the feedback Interpersonal conflict can be reduced Improves people to be more open, increases listening skills and others Efficiency of organisation and productivity is improved The facilator gives proper discussion and feedback thereby the facilator plays a very important role It has got broader scope but it lacks the specific goal. Feedback survey: Analysis of data done by different methods Information sharing is very important From all level of organisation, data collection of different levels has been done The participants and agents haven been transferred for the data usage. The solutions to the problem are only developed by the participants and they are very important to the organisation. Consultation of process: The process should be consulted as to make the process more effective Implementation of a goal for improving a particular process Problem solving method is increased and it the participants have been involved in it More steps/ pressure had been taken and given in order to reduce the inter personal problems. The consultation process determines the process that needs improvement. Interventions with teams: To improve the performance of teams working in the organisation Diagnosis of problems is done very quickly The main aim is to maintain and improve organisational process and team relationships Both the team member and the top management sit for a meeting to decide upon the diagnosis of problems. The whole groups and also divided into sub groups to collect different information for the organisational development is done. The guidance is given towards the achievements of goal The meeting is conducted only in need and also in regular intervals. Plans are prepared and what actions have to be taken is carefully observed and plan is handed over to the representatives. A Meeting to improve team building ( formal one ): The group of team building meeting is conducted at a far place The issues are discussed and the members are assigned with different responsibilities Action plan is prepared and given to the members The team building meeting is initated by managers with a supervision of external consultant. Team building techniques: Accepting things in a positive way and self awareness is very important Through repression and confrontation, the negative feeling can be resolved. Physiotherapy is made to involve in focusing on the individuals. Analysis of Role by John Thomas: Focal role is the name of this role It is a process that defines the role of team members Suggestions by team leaders, expectations are achieved By making compromises, certain problems are resolved. Interventions Intergroup team building: Improves relationship between different team groups Communication flow is easy Communication gap is understood and exchange of information is done Unresolved problems are discussed to make it solve as soon as possible It helps to improve the interaction level within groups Thus these are the steps done for intergroup team building Interventions Structural: It is mainly done in order to bring the change in task and technological process. Technostrutural interventions is also an another name of this interventions. Task 2 Royal mail group limited defines always that the whole group is for their people. They strongly believe that only hard work will take forward for their change required. Royal mail feels that it needs to develop proper relationship with the people and the stake holders. They are more focussed on delivering the incentives properly to the stake holders will identify them to accept the change. They are dedicated in encouraging Leadership commitment for the safety issues To set safety standards by the line and role managers Recognition of management , consequences faced and accountabilities are the major source to encourage by the royal mail group To develop the systems for the stakeholders first a proper system plan should be done and processed. It is explained below as follows Appropriate plan (adaption) The managers are made to know about the change in management and they are introduced for the development programme. Aims at helping the managers with respect to the development plan with different activities available to them It helps them to communicate a bit further about the values of managers thereby supporting the business Expectation of managers are re-enforced Motivate the managers so that the managers will try to excite or surprise people Proving update on current business Making the benefits of the event my development is very important. All these plans will make the manager become more enthusiastic about the change in plan and will be happy to introduce and explain these systems to the stake holders. This type of process and systems will be done with appropriate meeting with the stake holders and the people who are involved in this process. Proper feedback for the change in management will be explained by the role and line managers in the meeting thereby the stakeholders can also know what exactly is happening and why the change in management is needed. Stake holders should also be know the fact that what will be the output of this outcome. This development plan how it will help the organisations and how far it will benefit the stake holder .these analysis can be done by conducting audit reports on this process by external and internal factors. By analysing this system, the key stake holders will be in a proper well known state about the change in management. Task 2 To evaluate these systems and to involve the key stake holders in the organisation there are certain strategies to be followed It is explained as follows When there is a change, it is very important for the organisation to inform all of its sub-ordinates. In other words, getting people involved and communication are the main factors in evaluating and execution of change. Communication is a very important tool acting here as it not only involves listening but also the person can take the feedback and present it to the organisation thereby making them to take actions on it. To accept the change, there is always a fear for people which can be destroyed when there is a proper communication. The people will really get encouraged especially the stake holders if they know everything about the change with a proper communication. The royal mail should not think stake holders as obstacles but they need to explain them for the need in change, make them involve in it and make responsible. Royal mail should make the stake holders understand that change in development is done in order to develop the managers, responsible for decision making and oth er operational managements. The moment of sustainability is very important when there is a change in management. The stake holders and the royal mail group ltd should discuss about the resources provided for the change and the support for the change thereby reducing the reduction of enthusiasm in stake holders. The royal mail team will have a team for change management which will deal with difficulties, develop the managers for the change. Under this change in management, the managers will be in a position to use the resources and move the business forward with clear vision. All these strategies have to be explained clearly to the royal mail stake holders. Thus these are the strategy to be followed in order to involve the stakeholder in the change in management. Task 3 The new model that can be appropriate to the royal mail group is as follows Development of skills and new competences model There are five key areas where the managers should be capable of taking authority and responsibility at work Inspiration of people: Inspiring is an attractive term used in the field of management. When people get inspired they are really feeling happy about what the management is telling about. Thus by inspiring skills, the management can easily manage the change in organisation. Action focused: The main focus of action should be with the customers and the service. The royal mail group has got lot of actions to be focused. Especially, in winter times the postal services or the parcel process may get delayed which might annoy the customers. The royal group ltd should focus on this particular action and appoint some new volunteers staff to avoid any delay in their process. This would make the customers feel more confident on royal mail groups. All these action focus should be done by the managers and that is how they can easily manage the change in management. Seeking improvements: The managers should be always in an enthusiastic mood to seek improvements in their field. As a manger, he /she should be able to learn new things for the change in management. Only if the mangers are in a proper learned way, then only we can sort out all the external problems. Continuous seeking improvement is one of the skills needed for the managers. Results should be driving: These areas are considered to be the more sensitive area. The results where the managers should deliver should drive the customers to a greater extent. Even with the changes in policies the organisation should be able to give better results and perform better services to the customers Ownership should be taken by managers: The managers should be able to take ownership on their own and do everything with respect to the organisation. Under this management plan, managers will be able to acquire good confidence and the right skills and make royal mail a nice place to work. Thus these are the different skills to be acquired for the managers and thus these plans will be a appropriate model for the royal mail group ltd. Task 3 Implementation of model process and their outcomes To implement a process model the organisation need proper plan and proper managerial skills to be performed. The steps to be done are as follows Plan for programme: The organisation communicating with the people about their development plan an introduction is given in first quarter of the year. In this first quarter meeting, the managers will come to know about their new management change plan and their benefits. Top level executives, senior managers and other top level people will be heading this change management programme. This plan is essential to implement the process model successfully. Over the year there will be many practical workshops, Action learning training, modules skills classes. This will be taking place including e-coaching. Workshops ( Practical ): This work-shop will be a class based one and this will emphasize more on the safety issues diversity, and about the rapid growth of business ideas. This plan would be very ideal in the change in management system. Modules: Modules will be skill based development programme. This might include interaction with others, communication development, giving feedback, decision making, working in a collaborative manner and assertiveness etc. Action learning: The managers will go and meet with groups of other managers for a formal meeting to review the reports by time to time. This will enable action learning programme to be more efficient for the managers. The report will make the organisation to develop their progress in the any field the organisation demands. This action learning programme is implemented nowadays much in the corporate culture as to fill the communication gap and also to monitor the progress at regular time intervals. Coaching: A different type of coaching is being introduced by the managers which are called as external coaching. External teachers have been taking into the organisation and they help the managers or the individuals to improve their performance. These types of coaching help the managers to tackle many unresolved problems. E-learning: Nowadays e-learning is a very powerful a popular method to study and analyse different things. The information can be assessed online at any time irrespective of any problems. The manager will study products which include business management, different type of risk analysis, attendance, performance appraisal and many more. Reporting and Accessing: The manager performance is monitored and reported every year with different mentor giving feedback They are assessed in factors like How the manager has developed their sub-ordinates How the managers has identified themselves about the need and change in management and their responsibilities. To develop the people there are many process and time involved. This factor is assessed to manager on how he takes this factor importantly. Outstanding performance given to the managers with promotional offers. Senior appraisals and capability of mangers is also monitored in this process After accessing all this factors, a report from the mentor is given to the organisation thereby explaining the benefits done and efficiency of the manager. Feedbacks: This is a very important factor which decides so many things in an organisation. An employee survey is conducted in regular intervals to find out how the employees are in with the organisation. The royal mail group ltd does this as a way to improve further and it is done on weekly basis. Thus this is how the model should be implemented when there is a change in management and the improvements have been mentioned in the above report that why these plans are executed and done with respect to the organisation. Conclusion: This case-study royal mail group ltd is was very innovative. It was expressing all about the changes needed in operation when there is a change in management and how the managers should take responsibility and fix themselves into the different implementation plans and learn different things. The report was also talks about why change is required in this economy- The strengths and weakness of the bureaucratic organisations. The report also defines about the stake holders analysis and how the systems should be developed and how stake holders should be involved in the change in organisation. Finally, I have researched about the different plans to be learnt and implemented and their process and outcomes for the change in management. Overall, royal mail is looking at the organisation structure which can yield profit to them when the change has happened. My management plans shows that the organisation is expecting all the staffs to work together in this competitive challenging market and a chieve the targets. This development programme will make the life easier for the managers as they learn all the necessary things. Thus managers will do a great job in the change of management. The group wide management programme will also provide a great way to tackle the problems of the work force and to attain the sustainability of the organisation. The main important thing in this whole project is the capability of managers as he stands here as the back bone for the change in organisation. Thus overall, the manager plays a vital role in changing the change in management and culture change in the organisation.

Five Forces Porter Essay

These five forces are empirically derived, e.g. by observation of real companies in real markets, rather than the result of economic analysis. Porter’s five forces is a useful generic structure for thinking about the nature of industries. The understanding of the structure of an industry is the basis for formulation of competitive strategy. The work of Porter provides an analytical framework for the analysis of the structural factors that condition competition within an industry and suggests several generic competitive strategies. An industry is not a closed system, competitors exit and enter, and suppliers and buyers have a major effect on the prospects and profitability of the industry. However, Porter points out that the structure of an industry will not change in the short term. Industry structure is something that irrespective of the general economic climate or short term fluctuations in demand fundamentally affects return on investment. Structural change is slow and often associated with political and labour conflict. Structural factors are often cited as holding back development and in some cases governments make funds available to mitigate social problems caused by structural change. By understanding this Porter’s five forces framework that used to analyse industry’s competitive forces and to shape organization’s strategy, we can apply it in our company by developing the following steps below: 1.Gather the information on each of the five forces In this step, managers / strategists should gather information about their industry and to check it against each of the factors influencing the force. 2.Analyze the results and display them on a diagram / matrix In this step, managers / strategists should analyze the gathered information and determine how each force is affecting an industry. For example, if there are many companies of equal size operating in the slow growth industry, it means that rivalry between existing companies is strong. The thing that must be remembered is five forces affect different industries differently, so don’t use the same results of analysis for even similar industries. 3.Formulate strategies based on the conclusions At this step, managers / strategists should formulate firm’s strategies using  the results of the analysis. For example, if it is hard to achieve economies of scale in the market, the company should pursue cost leadership strategy. Product development strategy should be used if the current market growth is slow and the market is saturated. In the end, even though Five Forces is a great tool to analyze industry’s structure and use the results to formulate firm’s strategy, it has its limitations and requires further analysis to be completed such as SWOT, PEST, or Value Chain analysis.

Criticisms Against Ethical Theories

Criticisms leveled against Ethical Theories 1. Criticisms leveled against Consequentialism. Consequentialism is based on the consequences of actions. It is sometimes called a teleological theory, from the Greek word telos, meaning goal. According to consequentialism, actions are right or wrong depending on whether their consequences further the goal. The goal (or, â€Å"the good†) can be something like the happiness of all people or the spreading of peace and safety. Anything which contributes to that goal is right and anything which does not is wrong. Actions are thought to have no moral value in themselves (no rightness or wrongness), but only get moral value from whether or not they lead to the goal. John Stuart Mill was a famous consequentialist. Consequentialists would say that killing people is not right or wrong in itself, it depends on the outcome. Killing an innocent child would be a bad thing because it would decrease the happiness of its family and have no good results. Killing a terrorist would be a good thing because, although it would upset his family, it would make people safer. The main criticism of consequentialism is that it would allow any action in pursuit of a good cause, even actions that most people would say were clearly morally wrong, such as torture, killing children, genocide, etc. 2. Criticisms leveled against Deontology The word deontology comes from the Greek word deon, meaning duty. According to this theory, it is your duty to do actions which are right and not do those which are wrong. Actions are thought to be right or wrong in themselves. For example, killing people and lying are wrong, sharing with others who are in need is right. Immanuel Kant was a famous deontologist. E. g. While trekking in the Andes you come across a guerilla leader who has captured 20 local villagers. The guerilla says if you will shoot one hostage he will let the other 19 go free. If you refuse to shoot, he will kill all 20. In the thought experiment the guerilla leader is telling the truth and you have only two choices: to shoot, or to refuse. Choose to shoot, and you are a consequentialist, motivated by saving the 19 innocent people. Choose to refuse, and you are a deontologist, motivated by the fact that it is always wrong to kill an innocent person. The main criticism of deontology is that it is selfish, a way of avoiding getting your hands dirty (in a moral sense) while still allowing terrible things to happen. For instance, in the thought experiment you would not have shot anybody but 20 innocent people would still die. You could have prevented this outcome if you weren't afraid to take any guilt on yourself. 3. Criticisms of Utilitarianism †¢ Distastefulness By far and and away the most common criticism of utilitarianism can be reduced simply to: â€Å"I don't like it† or â€Å"It doesn't suit my way of thinking†. For an example of this, here's something from someone who might prefer to remain nameless. â€Å"Producing the greatest good for the greatest number is fine as long as you are not hurting someone you really love in the process. For instance, with the trolley situation, I would rather kill 5 people on the main track than my mother on the spur track. Utilitarianism runs into problems when sentiment is involved!! â€Å" Utilitarianism is alleged to be faulty in the way it requires us to think about all kinds of actions – to apply the felicific calculus in disregard to any feared distaste of the result. For example, some issues or potential actions are (to a non-utilitarian) â€Å"morally unthinkable†: Utilitarianism does indeed have something to say on this issue – otherwise it would suggest that the life of this extra individual was of no importance. I suggest it as a virtue of utility, that it does not arbitrarily discount value depending on some detail of the situation: all interests count – imply and fairly. The fact that opponents of utilitarianism admit that they won't even consider some situations seems to me to be most damning to their credibility, and indicative of their general irrationality on matters ethical. The argument from distaste is often expressed as a suggestion that utilitarianism doesn't provide enough support for individuals' rights. But what is a r ight, and what is its justification? If the justification of a right depends on its tendency to promote happiness and prevent suffering, then it is entirely redundant since this is the sole purpose of utility. And if rights aren't justified in these terms, how are they justified – what on earth are they actually good for? Of what use are they? It is generally found that the proponent of ethical rights has very unclear thinking as to what rights are and why they (should) exist – and it is therefore of unclear importance that utilitarianism does not support them. Doesn't utilitarianism imply that, if we found a drug which had the sole effect of producing happiness, we ought to mass produce and consume it? And, since happiness is just an emotion which can be chemically induced, isn't it a bit silly to make it the highest order objective? It is quite strange that many people will accept â€Å"the pursuit of happiness† as one of life's fundamental entitlements, yet should suddenly develop ascetic inclinations as soon as the quarry appears obtainable. It seems they don't have a problem with someone trying to achieve happiness, rather they are only concerned when that someone has a reasonable prospect of success in their attempts. Perhaps their fixation with unhappiness would be satisfied by personally abstaining from joy – but, if it goes further such that they would attempt to prevent individuals from attaining happiness even at no cost to others, then (from a utilitarian point of view) such people are despotical and a menace to society. It is possible that many people's aversion to the idea of everlasting happiness is caused by incomplete consideration of the issue. It could be that people have become so jaded by mistaken claims for the desirability of various intentional objects that they believe that drug-induced happiness simply would not be durably satisfying. Since any notion of happiness worthy of the name includes that of satisfaction, it follows that a truly happy person cannot be dissatisfied, so this problem can never arise. Happiness, in the utilitarian sense, includes the exemption from suffering. A charge of triviality for pleasure can perhaps be made, if our only frame of reference is the knowledge of felicific states currently achievable, but it is altogether less plausible against the depths of suffering currently experienced by the world's less fortunate beings. †¢ Impossibility The second most common criticism of utilitarianism is that it is impossible to apply – that happiness (etc) cannot be quantified or measured, that there is no way of calculating a trade-off between intensity and extent, or intensity and probability (etc), or comparing happiness to suffering. If happiness was not measurable, words like â€Å"happier† or â€Å"happiest† could have no meaning: â€Å"I was happier yesterday than I am today† would make no sense at all – it can only have the meaning which we (or most of us, at any rate) know that it has if we assume that happiness can be measured and compared. one should face the fact that goods are not necessarily intersubstitutable and consider the case, for instance, of an intransigent landowner who, when his avenue of limes is to be destroyed for the motorway, asks for 1p compensation, since nothing can be compensation. † [2] (One is reminded of the story of the mother handing out home-baked coo kies as a special treat to her family. The youngest child, on finding his cookie to be slightly smaller than the others, smashes it up and storms out in tears. In his disappointment, he interprets a fine gift as an affront, and he would rather make things worse than better – but then he's only a child. Adults, of course, have much less obvious and more subtle means of smashing their cookies. ) Initially, it seems very odd that the landowner should ask for a penny. If nothing can be compensation, why does he not ask for nothing? What use is this tiny amount of money? Far from suggesting that the trees are invaluable, it suggests that any money he could get for them is worthless to him! But, we may still ask, why the penny? And then we realize: it's a token; a chip in a psychological game (often called â€Å"Poor me! â€Å"). One can imagine the penny being carried about by the ex-landowner, and produced to evict pity from those unfortunates he manages to convince to listen to his story. That will be his best effort at compensating himself. Now suppose the scenario is amended slightly: imagine the landowner's daughter is dying from a terminal disease; that the motorway's supporters offer to pay for the new and expensive cure (which the landowner could not otherwise afford) in exchange for the land; and that they will not proceed without his permission. Are we still to presume that â€Å"nothing can be compensation† for his trees, not even the life of his daughter? Or will the landowner decide that his daughter's life is more important than his pretty view? It seems likely. But suppose not – suppose he chooses to keep the trees and lose his daughter. Does this show that the value of the lime avenue isn't convertible? Of course not, just that he values the trees more than his offspring. If the two different values were inconvertible, he would have no way to decide one way or the other – no way to choose between them. The fact that people can and do weigh-up and trade-off values, for all types of things, shows that it is both possible and practical to do so. In the original scenario, the sensible thing to do would be to ask for enough money to buy a new bit of land, and to plant a new avenue of limes on it; but, since the principle of utility does not imply the absence of fools, this criticism has no effect, and we needn't consider this matter further. †¢ Impracticality The third most common criticism is that it is too difficult to apply – that we cannot calculate all the effects for all the individuals (either because of the large number of individuals involved, and/or because of the uncertainty). The principle of utility is, essentially, a description of what makes something right or wrong – so in order for it to fail, someone must give an example of something which is useful but obviously wrong. The principle does not imply that we can calculate what is right or wrong – completely accurately, in advance, or at all! It does not harm the principle of utility at all merely to comment that it is difficult for us to work out what is right – it is merely a lament against the human condition. The idea of practicality is often used to suggest a problem exists in the theory, when it fact it does not. For example: â€Å"how far does one, under utilitarianism, have to research into the possibilities of maximally beneficent action, including prevention? † [3] The answer is simple, and entirely obvious: as far as it is useful to do so! That is, far enough so that we get the optimal trade-off between planning and implementing, so that we maximize our effectiveness as agents. The does imply that, in some cases, it may not be best to apply the felicific calculus at all: if the problem is one that we have faced many times before, and always reached the same conclusion; or if the case presents itself as an emergency, and isn't open to extended consideration; we can forego the calculus and act immediately. †¢ Insufficiency (of scope) One argument which some people propose as being more sensible than other criticisms, is that utilitarianism is â€Å"fine, so far as it goes†, but that it fails to consider some sources of value, and that it will therefore produce the wrong results when these different sources conflict. There is potential for confusion here – sometimes â€Å"utilitarianism† is used to specifically for â€Å"hedonistic utilitarianism†; and, sometimes, it means a particular class of ethical theory (something like â€Å"value-maximizing consequentialism†) †¦ under this meaning, an ethical theory which held the existence of plastic forks as supremely valuable, and therefore tried to maximize their number, would be â€Å"plastic fork utilitarianism†. [5] So, theories which have other intrinsic values than happiness and exemption from suffering can be accommodated within a utilitarian scheme. As for those other things that are suggested as having value, there are a few worth mentioning: â€Å"life†, â€Å"friendship†, and â€Å"knowledge† among them. I think it is notable that these things are valued, but that they also generally create happiness†¦ I suggest the reason that they are valued is precisely because they promote happiness. But, if they didn't, would we still value them? Does someone who suffers too much still value their life? Surely not, or else there would be no suicides. Do we value a friendship if we get no pleasure from it? On the contrary, it is more likely that we would define our friends as those people about whom we enjoyed being. And is it worthwhile learning and philosophising, if our knowledge is never of any use at all? Or, rather, is it just so much meta-physical stamp collecting? The case against these â€Å"other† goals is quite clear. 4. A Critique of Ethical Egoism Ethical egoism, like all exclusively subjective philosophies, is prone to constant self-contradiction because it supports all individuals' self interests. It also can lead to very unpleasant conclusions, such as choosing not to intervene in a crime against another. Egoists have difficulty judging anything that does not deal with them, which is one reason why ethical egoism is so impractical for people who are very aware of the world. The very legitimacy of the theory is often called into question because it prevents its own adherents from taking reasonable stances on major political and social issues and cannot in itself solve these issues. 5. Criticisms against Ethical Relativism A common argument against relativism suggests that it inherently contradicts, refutes, or stultifies itself: the statement â€Å"all is relative† classes either as a relative statement or as an absolute one. If it is relative, then this statement does not rule out absolutes. If the statement is absolute, on the other hand, then it provides an example of an absolute statement, proving that not all truths are relative. However, this argument against relativism only applies to relativism that positions truth as relative–i. e. pistemological/truth-value relativism. More specifically, it is only strong forms of epistemological relativism that can come in for this criticism as there are many epistemological relativists who posit that some aspects of what is regarded as â€Å"true† are not universal, yet still accept that other universal truths exist (e. g. gas laws). However, such exceptions need to be carefully justified, or â€Å"anything goes†. Another argume nt against relativism posits a Natural Law. Simply put, the physical universe works under basic principles: the â€Å"Laws of Nature†. Some contend that a natural Moral Law may also exist, for example as argued by Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion (2006)[35] and addressed by C. S. Lewis in â€Å"Mere Christianity† (1952). [36] Dawkins said â€Å"I think we face an equal but much more sinister challenge from the left, in the shape of cultural relativism – the view that scientific truth is only one kind of truth and it is not to be especially privileged. â€Å"[37] Aside from the general legitimacy of relativism, critics say it undermines morality, possibly resulting in anomie and complete Social Darwinism. Relativism denies that harming others is wrong in any absolute sense. The majority of relativists, of course, consider it immoral to harm others, but relativist theory allows for the opposite belief. In short, if an individual can believe it wrong to harm others, he can also believe it right–no matter what the circumstances. The problem of negation also arises. If everyone with differing opinions is right, then no one is. Thus instead of saying â€Å"all beliefs (ideas, truths, etc. ) are equally valid,† one might just as well say â€Å"all beliefs are equally worthless†. (see article on Doublethink). Another argument is that if relativism presupposes that â€Å"all beliefs are equally valid,† it then implies that any belief system holding itself to be the only valid one is untrue, which is a contradiction. An argument made by Hilary Putnam,[38] among others, states that some forms of relativism make it impossible to believe one is in error. If there is no truth beyond an individual's belief that something is true, then an individual cannot hold their own beliefs to be false or mistaken. A related criticism is that relativizing truth to individuals destroys the distinction between truth 6. Criticism of Virtue Ethics: According to critics, a major problem with the theory is the difficulty of establishing the nature of the virtues, especially as different people, cultures and societies often have vastly different opinions on what constitutes a virtue. Some proponents counter-argue that any character trait defined as a virtue must be universally regarded as a virtue for all people in all times, so that such cultural relativism is not relevant. Others, however, argue that the concept of virtue must indeed be relative and grounded in a particular time and place, but this in no way negates the value of the theory, merely keeps it current. Another objection is that the theory is not â€Å"action-guiding†, and does not focus on what sorts of actions are morally permitted and which ones are not, but rather on what sort of qualities someone ought to foster in order to become a good person. Thus, a virtue theorist may argue that someone who commits a murder is severely lacking in several important virtues (e. g. compassion and fairness, among others), but does proscribe murder as an inherently immoral or impermissible sort of action, and the theory is therefore useless as a universal norm of acceptable conduct uitable as a base for legislation. Virtue theorists may retort that it is in fact possible to base a judicial system on the moral notion of virtues rather than rules (modern theories of law related to Virtue Ethics are known as virtue jurisprudence, and focus on the importance of character and human excellence as opposed to moral rules or consequences). They argue that Virtue Ethics can also be action-guiding through observance of virtuous agents as examplars, and through the life-long process of moral learning, for which quick-fix rules are no substitute. Some have argued that Virtue Ethics is self-centred because its primary concern is with the agent's own character, whereas morality is supposed to be about other people, and how our actions affect other people. Thus, any theory of ethics should require us to consider others for their own sake, and not because particular actions may benefit us. Some argue that the whole concept of personal well-being (which is essentially just self-interest) as an ethical master value is mistaken, especially as its very personal nature does not admit to comparisons between individuals. Proponents counter that virtues in themselves are concerned with how we respond to the needs of others, and that the good of the agent and the good of others are not two separate aims, but both result from the exercise of virtue. Other critics are concerned that Virtue Ethics leaves us hostage to luck, and that it is unfair that some people will be lucky and receive the help and encouragement they need to attain moral maturity, while others will not, through no fault of their own. Virtue Ethics, however, embraces moral luck, arguing that the vulnerability of virtues is an essential feature of the human condition, which makes the attainment of the good life all the more valuable. †¢ Cultural diversity Some criticize virtue ethics in relation to the difficulty involved with establishing the nature of the virtues. They argue that different people, cultures, and societies often have vastly different perspectives on what constitutes a virtue. For example, many would have once considered a virtuous woman to be quiet, servile, and industrious. This conception of female virtue no longer holds true in many modern societies. Alasdair MacIntyre responds to this criticism, by arguing that any account of the virtues must indeed be generated out of the community in which those virtues are to be practiced: The very word â€Å"ethics† implies â€Å"ethos. † That is to say that the virtues are, and necessarily must be, grounded in a particular time and place. What counts as virtue in fourth century Athens would be a ludicrous guide to proper behavior in twenty-first century Toronto, and vice versa. But, the important question in virtue ethics as to what kind of person one ought to be, which may be answered differently depending on the ethos, can still give real direction and purpose to people. †¢ Lack of moral rules Another criticism of virtue ethics is that it lacks absolute moral rules which can give clear guidance on how to act in specific circumstances such as abortion, embryo research, and euthanasia. Martha Nussbaum responds to this criticism, by saying that there are no absolute rules. In a war situation, for example, the rule that you must not kill an innocent person is impractical. According to Nussbaum, it is the virtues that are absolutes, and we should strive for them. If elected leaders strive for them, things will go well. On the issue of embryo research, Alasdair MacIntyre suggests that people first need to understand the social situation in which although many people are negative about embryonic stem-cell research, they are not upset with the fact that thousands of embryos actually die at various stages in the IVF (in vitro fertilization) process. Then, says MacIntyre, people need to approach the issue with virtues such as wisdom, right ambition, and temperance. Thus, some virtue ethicists argue that it is possible to base a judicial system on the moral notion of virtues rather than on rules. 7. Critiques of Normative Contractarianism Many critiques have been leveled against particular contractarian theories and against contractarianism as a framework for normative thought about justice or morality. (See the entry on contemporary approaches to the social contract. ) Jean Hampton criticized Hobbes in her book Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition, in a way that has direct relevance to contemporary contractarianism. Hampton argues that the characterization of individuals in the state of nature leads to a dilemma. Hobbes' state of nature as a potential war of all against all can be generated either as a result of passions (greed and fear, in particular) or rationality (prisoner's dilemma reasoning, in which the rational players each choose to renege on agreements made with each other). But if the passions account is correct, then Hampton argues, the contractors will still be motivated by these passions after the social contract is drawn up, and so will fail to comply with it. And if the rationality account is correct, then rational actors will not comply with the social contract any more than they will cooperate with each other before it is made. This critique has an analog for Gauthier's theory, in that Gauthier must also claim that without the contract individuals will be stuck in some socially sub-optimal situation that is bad enough to motivate them to make concessions to each other for some agreement, yet the reason for their inability to cooperate without the contract cannot continue to operate after the contract is made. Gauthier's proposed solution to this problem is to argue that individuals will choose to dispose themselves to be constrained (self-interest) maximizers rather than straightforward (self-interest) maximizers, that is, to retrain themselves not to think first of their self-interest, but rather to dispose themselves to keep their agreements, provided that they find themselves in an environment of like-minded individuals. But this solution has been found dubitable by many commentators. (See Vallentyne, 1991) Hampton also objects to the contemporary contractarian assumption that interaction is merely instrumentally valuable. She argues that if interaction were only valuable for the fruits of cooperation that it bears for self-interested cooperators, then it would be unlikely that those cooperators could successfully solve the compliance problem. In short, they are likely not to be able to motivate morality in themselves without some natural inclination to morality. Interestingly, Hampton agrees with Gauthier that contractarianism is right to require any moral or political norms to appeal to individuals self-interest as a limitation on self-sacrifice or exploitation of any individual. In an important article, â€Å"On Being the Object of Property,† African-American law professor Patricia Williams offers a critique of the contract metaphor itself. Contracts require independent agents who are able to make and carry out promises without the aid of others. Historically, while white men have been treated as these pure wills of contract theory, Blacks and women have been treated as anti-will: dependent and irrational. Both ideals are false; whole people, she says, are dependent on other whole people. But by defining some as contractors and others as incapable of contract, whole classes of people can be excluded from the realm of justice. This point has been taken up by other critics of contractarianism, such as Eva Kittay (1999) who points out that not only are dependents such as children and disabled people left out of consideration by contractarian theories, but their caretakers' needs and interests will tend to be underestimated in the contract, as well. David Hume was an early critic of the validity of social contract theory, arguing against any theory based on a historical contract, on the grounds that one should not be bound by the consent of one's ancestors. He also questioned to what extent the fall-back â€Å"state of nature† which underlies most social contract theory is actually historically accurate, or whether it is just a hypothetical or possible situation. Others have pointed out that, with an assumed initial position which is sufficiently dire (such as that posited by Hobbes), Contractarianism may lead to the legitimization of Totalitarianism (as Hobbes himself foresaw). Some commentators have argued that a social contract of the type described cannot be considered a legitimate contract at all, on the grounds that the agreement is not fully voluntary or without coercion, because a government can and will use force against anyone who does not wish to enter into the contract. In Rousseau's conception of the social contract, even individuals who disagree with elements of the social contract must nevertheless agree to abide by it or risk punishment (they must be â€Å"forced to be free†). It is argued that this idea of force negates the requirement that a contract be entered into voluntarily, or at least to permit individuals to abstain from entering into a contract. In response, it has been countered that the name â€Å"contract† is perhaps misleading (â€Å"social compact† has been suggested as an alternative), and that anyway individuals explicitly indicate their consent simply by remaining in the jurisdiction. Either way, social contract theory does seem to be more in accordance with contract law in the time of Hobbes and Locke (based on a mutual exchange of benefits) than in our own. Other critics have questioned the assumption that individuals are always self-interested, and that they would actually want the benefits of society supposedly offered by the contract. A further objection sometimes raised is that Contractarianism is more of a descriptive theory than a normative guide or a justification. 8. Critiques of Rights Theory Critiques of rights come in two forms. The first is an attack on the substance of doctrines that give rights a central place. These critiques allege that the content of such doctrines is, in one way or other, malformed or unjustified. Here we find, for example, the criticism that natural rights doctrines are â€Å"so much flat assertion,† and that utilitarian rights tend to be implausibly weak. The second form of critique attacks the language of rights itself. The objection here is that it is inappropriate or counterproductive to express at least some kinds of normative concerns in terms of rights. We should, according to the second form of critique, reduce or avoid â€Å"rights talk. †¢ Critiques of Rights Doctrine Marx attacked the substance of the revolutionary eighteenth century American and French political documents that proclaimed the fundamental â€Å"rights of man†: liberty, equality, security, property, and the free exercise of religion. Marx objected that these alleged rights derive from a false conception of the human individual as unrelated to others, as having interests can be defined without reference to others, and as always potentially in conflict with others. The rights-bearing individual is an â€Å"isolated monad†¦ withdrawn behind his private interests and whims and separated from the community. † (Marx 1844, 146) The right of property, Marx asserted, exemplifies the isolating and anti-social character of these alleged rights of man. On the one hand, the right of property is the right to keep others at a distance: the legal equivalent of a barbed wire fence. On the other hand, the right of property allows an owner to transfer his resources at his own pleasure and for his own gain, without regard even for the desperate need for those resources elsewhere. Similarly, Marx held that the much-celebrated individual right to liberty reinforces selfishness. Those who are ascribed the right to do what they wish so long as they do not hurt others will perpetuate a culture of egoistic obsession. As for equality, the achievement of equal rights in a liberal state merely distracts people from noticing that their equality is purely formal: a society with formally equal rights will continue to be divided by huge inequalities in economic and political power. Finally, these so-called â€Å"natural† rights are in fact not natural to humans at all. They are simply the defining elements of the rules of the modern mode of production, perfectly suited to fit each individual into the capitalist machine. Communitarians (Taylor, Walzer, MacIntyre, Sandel) sound several of the same themes in their criticisms of contemporary liberal and libertarian theories. The communitarians object that humans are not, as such theories assume, â€Å"antecedently individuated. † Nozick's â€Å"state of nature† theorizing, for example, errs in presuming that individuals outside of a stable, state-governed social order will develop the autonomous capacities that make them deserving of rights. Nor should we attempt, as in Rawls's original position, to base an argument for rights on what individuals would choose in abstraction from their particular identities and community attachments. There is no way to establish a substantive political theory on what all rational agents want in the abstract. Rather, theorists should look at the particular social contexts in which real people live their lives, and to the meanings that specific goods carry within different cultures. This criticism continues by accusing liberal and libertarian theories of being falsely universalistic, in insisting that all societies should bend themselves to fit within a standard-sized cage of rights. Insofar as we should admit rights into our understanding of the world at all, communitarians say, we should see them as part of ongoing practices of social self-interpretation and negotiation— and so as rules that can vary significantly between cultures. These kinds of criticisms have been discussed in detail (e. g. Gutmann 1985, Waldron 1987b, Mulhall and Swift 1992). Their validity turns on weighty issues in moral and political theory. What can be said here is that a common theme in most of these criticisms—that prominent rights doctrines are in some way excessively individualistic or â€Å"atomistic†Ã¢â‚¬â€need not cut against any theory merely because it uses the language of rights. Ignatieff (2003, 67) errs, for example, when he charges that â€Å"rights language cannot be parsed or translated into a nonindividualistic, communitarian framework. It presumes moral individualism and is nonsensical outside that assumption. † As we saw above, the language of rights is able to accommodate rightholders who are individuals as such, but also individuals considered as members of groups, as well as groups themselves, states, peoples, and so on. Indeed the non-individualistic potential of rights-language is more than a formal possibility. The doctrine of international human rights—the modern cousin of eighteenth century natural rights theory—ascribes several significant rights to groups. The international Convention against Genocide, for example, forbids actions intending to destroy any national, ethnic, racial or religious group; and both of the human rights Covenants ascribe to peoples the right to self-determination. Such examples show that the language of rights is not individualistic in its essence. †¢ Critiques of the Language of Rights The language of rights can resist the charge that it is necessarily complicit with individualism. However, critics have accused rights talk of impeding social progress: Our rights talk, in its absoluteness promotes unrealistic expectations, heightens social conflict, and inhibits dialogue that might lead toward consensus, accommodation, or at least the discovery of common ground. In its silence concerning responsibilities, it seems to condone acceptance of the benefits of living in a democratic social welfare state, without accepting the corresponding personal and civic obligations†¦. In its insularity, it shuts out potentially important aids to the process of self-correcting learning. All of these traits promote mere assertion over reason-giving. Glendon (1991, 14) here draws out some of the detrimental practical consequences of the popular connection between rights and conclusive reasons that we saw above. Since rights assertions suggest conclusive reasons, people can be tempted to assert rights when they want to end a discussion instead of continuing it. One plays a right as a trump card when one has run out of arguments. Similarly, the ready availability of rights language may lead parties initially at odds with each other toward confrontation instead of negotiation, as each side escalates an arms-race of rights assertions that can only be resolved by a superior authority like a court. One line of feminist theory has picked up on this line of criticism, identifying the peremptory and rigidifying discourse of rights with the confrontational masculine â€Å"voice. † (Gilligan 1993) It is not inevitable that these unfortunate tendencies will afflict those who make use of the language of rights. As we have seen, it may be plausible to hold that each right is â€Å"absolute† only within a elaborately gerrymandered area. And it may be possible to produce deep theories to justify why one has the rights that one asserts. However, it is plausible that the actual use of rights talk does have the propensities that Glendon suggests. It seems no accident that America, â€Å"the land of rights,† is also the land of litigation. Another deleterious consequence of rights talk that Glendon picks out is its tendency to move the moral focus toward persons as rightholders, instead of toward persons as bearers of responsibilities. This critique is developed by O'Neill (1996, 127–53; 2002, 27–34). A focus on rightholders steers moral reasoning toward the perspective of recipience, instead of toward the traditional active ethical questions of what one ought to do and how one ought to live. Rights talk also leads those who use it to neglect important virtues such as courage and beneficence, which are duties to which no rights correspond. Finally, the use of rights language encourages people to make impractical demands, since one can assert a right without attending to the desirability or even the possibility of burdening others with the corresponding obligations. Criticisms such as O'Neill's do not target the language of rights as a whole. They aim squarely at the passive rights, and especially at claim-rights, instead of at the active privileges and powers. Nevertheless, it is again plausible that the spread of rights talk has encouraged the tendencies that these criticisms suggest. The modern discourse of rights is characteristically deployed by those who see themselves or others as potential recipients, entitled to insist on certain benefits or protections. Describing fundamental norms in terms of rights has benefits as well as dangers. The language of rights can give clear expression to elaborate structures of freedom and authority. When embodied in particular doctrines, such as in the international human rights documents, the language of rights can express in accessible terms the standards for minimally acceptable treatment that individuals can demand from those with power over them. Rights are also associated with historical movements for greater liberty and equality, so assertions of rights in pursuit of justice can carry a resonance that other appeals lack. Whether these benefits of using rights language overbalance the dangers remains a live question in moral, political and legal theory. †¢ The Critique of Rights The critique of rights developed by critical legal theorists has five basic elements: o The discourse of rights is less useful in securing progressive social change than liberal theorists and politicians assume. Legal rights are in fact indeterminate and incoherent. o The use of rights discourse stunts human imagination and mystifies people about how law really works. o At least as prevailing in American law, the discourse of rights reflects and produces a kind of isolated individualism that hinders social solidarity and genuine human connection. o Rights discourse can actually impede progressive movement for genuine democracy and justice. Right s should not be credited with progressive political advances. In â€Å"The Critique of Rights,† 47 SMU Law Review, Mark Tushnet emphasizes the first theme in arguing that progressive lawyers overestimate the importance of their work because of an inflated and erroneous view of the role of the Supreme Court in advancing progressive goals in the 1960s. That period of judicial leadership was aberrational in American history and also more reactive and pro-active, depending on mass social movements rather than lawyers’ arguments. Legal victories also are often not enforced; judicial victories do not obviate the need for ongoing political mobilization. Legal victories may have ideological value even where they lack material effects; a court victory can mark the entry of previously excluded groups into the discourse of rights which holds ideological importance inside the nation. Nonetheless, legal and political cultures inside the United States can also produce large consequences from judicial losses for relatively powerless groups. Losing a case based on a claim of rights may in some cases lead the public to think that the claims have no merit and need not be given weight in policy debates. Robert Gordon similarly argues that even noted legal victories for blacks, for labor, for the poor, and for women did not succeed in fundamentally altering the social power structure. â€Å"The labor movement secured the vitally important legal right to organize and strike, at the cost of fitting into a framework of legal regulation that certified the legitimacy of managements making most of the important decisions about the conditions of work. † Robert Gordon, â€Å"Some Critical Theories of law and Their Critics,† in The Politics of Law 647 (David Kairys ed. , third edition, Basic Books: New York, 1998). Moreover, rights are double-edged, as demonstrated in the content of civil rights. â€Å"Floor entitlements can be turned into ceilings (you’ve got your rights, but that’s all you’ll get). Formal rights without practical enforceable content are easily substituted for real benefits. Anyway, the powerful can always assert counter rights (to vested property, to differential treatment according to â€Å"merit,† to association with one’s own kind) to the rights of the disadvantaged. â€Å"Rights† conflict and the conflict cannot be resolved by appeal to rights. † Id. , at 657-68. The content of contemporary American rights in particular must be understood as failing to advance progressive causes. Current constitutional doctrine, for example, heavily favors so-called negative liberties (entitlements to be free of government interference) over positive liberties (entitlements to government protection or aid) and thus reinforces the pernicious â€Å"public/private† distinction. That distinction implies that neither government nor society as a whole are responsible for providing persons with the resources they need to exercise their liberties, and indeed, any governmental action risks violating private liberties. Current freedom of speech doctrine accords protection to commercial speech and pornography, limits governmental regulation of private contributions to political campaigns, and forbids sanctions for hate speech. Such rules operate in the often-stirring language of individual freedom, but their effect is more likely to be regressive than progressive. Rights are indeterminate and incoherent. As Mark Tushnet puts it, â€Å"nothing whatever follows from a courts adoption of some legal rule (except insofar as the very fact that a court has adopted the rule has some social impact the ideological dimension with which the critique of rights is concerned. Progressive legal victories occur, according to the indeterminacy thesis, because of the surrounding social circumstances. † At least as they figure in contemporary American legal discourse, rights cannot provide answer to real cases because they are cast at high levels of abstraction without clear application to particular problems an d because different rights frequently conflict or present gaps. Often, judges try to resolve conflicts by attempting to â€Å"balance† individual rights against relevant â€Å"social interests† or by assessing the relative weight of two or more conflicting rights. These methods seem more revealing of individual judicial sensibilities and political pressures than specific reach of specific rights. Moreover, central rights are themselves internally incoherent. The right to freedom of contract, for example, combines freedom with control: people should be free to bind themselves to agreements: the basic idea is private ordering. But the laws reliance on courts to enforce contracts reveals the doctrines grant of power to the government to decide which agreements to enforce, and indeed what even counts as an agreement. Even more basically, freedom of contract implies that the freedom of both sides to the contract can be enhanced and protected, and yet no one stands able to know what actually was in the minds of parties on both sides. Resort to notions of objective intent and formalities replace commitment to the freedom of the actual parties. 3. Legal rights stunt people’s imagination and mystify people about how law really works. The very language of a right, like the right to freedom of contract, appeals to peoples genuine desires for personal autonomy and social solidarity, and yet masks the extent to which the social order makes both values elusive, rite Peter Gabel and Jay Fineman, in Contract Law as Ideology, in The Politics of Law 496,498 (David Kairys, ed. , third edition, Basic Books: New York 1998). Contract law in fact works to conceal the coercive system of relationships with widespread unfairness in contemporary market-based societies. The system of rights renders invisible the persistent functional roles such as landlord, tenant, employer, and individual consumer of products produced by multinational conglomerates, that themselves reflect widely disparate degrees of economic and political power. Contract law is a significant feature in the massive denial of experiences of impotence and isolation and the apology for the system producing such experiences. Similar points can be made about other areas of law. Property rights, for example, imply promotion of individual freedom and security, and yet owners property rights are precisely the justification afforded to the control of others and arbitrary discretion to wreak havoc over the lives of tenants, workers, and neighbors. Contract law artificially constrains analysis by focusing n a discrete promise and a discrete act of reliance rather than complex and often diffuse communications and inevitable reliance by people on others than. Courts and legislatures recognize to some extent the power of these real features of people’s lives but the language of legal rules often leads decision makers to feel powerless to act on such recognition. Workers at a U. S. Steel plant in Youngstown, Ohio and their lawyers tried to buy the plant after the company announced plans to close it. Federal trial and appellate judges acknowledged that the plant was the lifeblood of the community but nonetheless concluded that contract and property law provided no basis for preventing the company either from shutting down the plant or refusing to negotiate to sell it to the workers. Local 1330, United Steel Workers v. United States Steel Corp. 631 F. 2d 1264 (6th Cir. 1980). Gabel and Feinman conclude: â€Å"it was not the law that restrained the judges, but their own beliefs in the ideology of law. By recognizing the possibilities of social responsibility and solidarity that are immanent in the doctrine of reliance, they could have both provided the workers a remedy and helped to move contract law in a direction that would better align the legal ideals of freedom, equality, and community with the realization of these ideals in everyday life. † Id. ,at 509. But the ideology of law made the judges feel they could not do so. [more reading: Staughton Lynd, the fight Against Shutdowns: Youngstown’s Steel Mill Closings (Single Jack Books: San Pedro, CA 1982); Joseph William Singer, The Reliance Interest in Property, 40 Stanford Law Rev. 11 (1988)] Conventional rights discourse reflects and produces isolated individualism and hinders social solidarity and genuine human connection. The individualism pervading American law calls for â€Å"the making of a sharp distinction between ones interests and those of others, combined with the belief that a preference in conduct for one’s own interests is legitimate, but that one should be willing to respect the rules that make it possible to coexist with others similarly self-interested. The form of conduct associated with individualism is self-reliance. This means an insistence on defining and achieving objectives without help from others (i. e. , without being dependent on them or asking sacrifices of them. † Duncan Kennedy, Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication, 89 Harv. L. Rev. 1685(1976). As implemented in law, individualism means that there are some areas within which actors (whether actual individuals or groups) have total arbitrary discretion to pursue their own ends without regard to the impact of their actions on others. A legal right evokes the idea of a domain protected by law within which the individual is free to do as he or she pleases, and the arrangements ensuring that freedom are fair, neutral, and equitable. Judges must facilitate private ordering and avoid regulating or imposing their own values on the aggregate of individual choices. The state thereby polices all boundary crossings by private individuals and contributes to the pretense that individual, private, self-interested values are all that matter. Yet people need others as much as they need their own freedom. Altruism has roots as deep as individualism, and altruism urges sacrifice, sharing, cooperation, and attention to others. Rights help people deny the equal tug of individual freedom and social solidarity on people’s hearts and assert that legal rules resolve the tension by assuring that people relate to one another through the recognition and respect for each other’s separate, bounded spheres of self-interest. Yet this very mode of thinking renders it more difficult for individuals and for the legal system to act upon altruism, social cooperation, and relationships of generosity, reciprocity, and sacrifice. The legal structure of rules, and the abstracted roles (owner, employee etc. ) upon which it depends makes it more likely that people feel helpless to counteract existing hierarchies of wealth and privilege or any perceived unfairness. Robert Gordon explains: â€Å"This process of allowing the structures we ourselves have built to mediate relations among us so as to make us see ourselves as performing abstract roles in a play that is produced by no human agency is what is usually called (following Marx and such modern writers as Sartre and Lukacs) reification. It is a way people have of manufacturing necessity: they build structures, then act as if (and genuinely come to believe that) the structures they have built are determined by history, human nature, and economic law. † Robert Gordon, Some Critical Theories of law and Their Critics, in the Politics of Law 650 (David Kairys, ed. , third edition, Basic Books: New York 1998). Rights discourse actually can impede genuine democracy and justice. Rights discourse contributes to passivity, alienation, and a sense of inevitability about the way things are. Even when relatively powerless groups win a legal victory, the rights involved can impede progressive social change. The victory may make those who won it complacent while galvanizing their opponents to do all they can to minimize the effects of the ruling. Conflicting rights or alternative interpretations of the same rights are always available. Conservatives can deploy the indeterminacy of rights for their benefit. Using the language of rights reinforces the individualistic ideology and claims of absolute power within individual’s spheres of action that must be undermined if progressive social change is to become more possible. The language of rights perpetuates the misconception that legal argument is independent of political argument and social movements. Through rights language, those in power often grant strategic concessions of limits sets of rights to co-opt genuinely radical social movements. Progressives who use the language of rights thus lend support to the ideology they must oppose. With the notable exception of Roberto Unger, who has proposed an alternative regime with immunity rights, destabilization rights, market rights, and solidarity rights, most critical legal scholars argue that rights do not advance and may impede political and social change. Rights are indeterminate and yet conceal the actual operations of power and human yearnings for connection and mutual aid. Contemporary legal and constitutional practice are less likely to provide avenues for challenging unfair social and economic hierarchies than political movements, and a focus on law reform can divert and disengage those political movements. Criticism: There is some element of truth in this theory, but difficult to believe that all rights enjoyed by people in a state are true to customs and traditions. Human society is dynamic and the custom change from time to time and from place to place. Rights correspond the different stages in the evolution of human society. Rights enjoyed people in a capitalist society, for example, are different from the enjoyed by people in a feudal society. There can be no unanimity opinion as to what historical rights are. Laski says, â€Å"We do not mean by rights the grant of some his conditions possessed in the childhood of the race, but lost in the pr of time. Few theories have done greater harm to philosophy, or m violence to facts, than the notion that they represent the recovery of a inheritance. There is no golden age to which we may seek to return. † References